Home--> Articles -->Search Engines
Post By wuhanzou on 2008-9-11 20:43:05 [Reads:278]
Google penalty:it is not finished!
Google these last weeks saw to rain the strokes. After big sites penalized for sale of ties, continuous Google to disassemble the sites that seem him to manipulate its results.
Last in date: "BIG-Directory."
Past of PR6 in PR3, big "visual" sanction - as a lot of sites penalized this last time received some - this time burdened of an obvious loss of positioning: the directory dove in the index on a flight of competitive requests, on its name, the elements of its title, etc. Only the "BIG-annuaire.com" request copes (to note: the SiteLinkses are there, on the other hand). All it glues marvellously with the script describes by Rand on SEOmoz.
The more intriguing is that number of sites that had undergone a "PageRank penalty" these last weeks had not seen their affected positioning. In the present case, him y'a very clearly a penalty "positioning" also, and it risks to come with a traffic fall and intrinsically of profitability.
I want to ask the following question: What could we really make "BIG directory" to be penalized of the sort? To part the homepage of BIG-annuaire.com that is of one point of technical view non compliant to the Googles guidelines (that recommend about hundred ties by page to the maximum), I don't see what can be worth them a penalty too much.
Is this the format, who would appear too much oriented "link juice", and not enough "visitor satisfaction?"
If you are also concerned by this kind of problem, don't hesitate to comment, that one tried to unite the elements allowing us to analyze these penalties more deeply.
Google penalty:it is not finished!
Post By wuhanzou on 2008-9-11 20:43:05 [Reads:278]
Google penalty:it is not finished!
Google these last weeks saw to rain the strokes. After big sites penalized for sale of ties, continuous Google to disassemble the sites that seem him to manipulate its results.
Last in date: "BIG-Directory."
Past of PR6 in PR3, big "visual" sanction - as a lot of sites penalized this last time received some - this time burdened of an obvious loss of positioning: the directory dove in the index on a flight of competitive requests, on its name, the elements of its title, etc. Only the "BIG-annuaire.com" request copes (to note: the SiteLinkses are there, on the other hand). All it glues marvellously with the script describes by Rand on SEOmoz.
The more intriguing is that number of sites that had undergone a "PageRank penalty" these last weeks had not seen their affected positioning. In the present case, him y'a very clearly a penalty "positioning" also, and it risks to come with a traffic fall and intrinsically of profitability.
I want to ask the following question: What could we really make "BIG directory" to be penalized of the sort? To part the homepage of BIG-annuaire.com that is of one point of technical view non compliant to the Googles guidelines (that recommend about hundred ties by page to the maximum), I don't see what can be worth them a penalty too much.
Is this the format, who would appear too much oriented "link juice", and not enough "visitor satisfaction?"
If you are also concerned by this kind of problem, don't hesitate to comment, that one tried to unite the elements allowing us to analyze these penalties more deeply.