Home--> Articles -->Link Exchange
Post By 328tianshi on 2008-9-11 20:50:14 [Reads:367]
More of info on the PageRank
Google Of from there one sees here, to panic the administrators of sites (webmasters, in current language) about one stake-to-day of PageRank.
I am alarmed to see to what point some (so-called) professional are dependent of this #118alue of PageRank displayed (in the rod of Google tools, or on the sites that exploit this information), when one knows to what point this information is completely petty.
Not only a too big number of people thinks that this displayed #118alue is living, to know that it influences on the positioning of their site, that it transmits more relevance to the other pages, etc. but in more, they see this #118alue like a real objective, whereas it is only an indicator.
What can be the interest of a question as "How to increase my PageRank to have more visitors"?
None, well evidently, since these two elements are not who are on no account bound.
They have common factors:a well positioned site has more visitors and a better PageRank.
The PageRank and the positioning have common, or parallel factors: a well referenced site is positioned potentially well, and has fact a big number of visitors potentially.
It is very likely that this same quality of referencement, associated to factors as the qualitative aspect of the content and an indication of confidence confer him a good enough PageRank also.
. but they are not bound!
Google has a service "Communication to the very original public", in the person of Matt Cutts, engineer-carry-speech at home. Even though this one sometimes comes us out of the tickets without interest on its culinary preferences in the canteen of the GooglePlex, or on what it read during his/its vacations. it also happens to him to reveal interesting information about the real working of Google - by opposition to the calculations of some webmasters-referenceurs of Sunday.
It was the case this last October 2. Is this anglophobia or the lack of interest that make that no one seems to be interested itself of it.? don't I know, but for landing to the first problem, me I am told that him was big time to translate this ticket of Matt Cutts, title "More info one PageRank."
It is about a literal translation, the most faithful possible to the original text, purified of some lines without report with the topic. It is a session of Q/R: the questions are in italic, the answers of Matt Cutts are in greasiness.
All few months, we put up to date the information that we display in the rod of tools, and all few months I see a set of questions repeating itself, let's take advantage then of the opportunity to answer some.
Philipp Lenssen: "Matt, I often wonder how the #118alue of the PageRank is stocked in intern. Is this a number to floating comma as suggested by some, or is this a real number"?
It is more discriminating to see it like a number to floating comma. It goes without saying that our internal calculation of PageRank is a lot more precise than a number between 0 and 10 as indicated by the rod of tools.
Viggen: Do I have need to know that? What brings me the fact to know this number? Why would worry me? Do I want to say, what is the interest of the PageRank for the small sites dad's"?
Viggen, I think that it is a very healthy attitude. If you are not interested in the PageRank and that your site carries itself well, me. that goes to me.
Andrew Hunter: Is it "that Dated them Centers that use a decidedly older infrastructure will be put to-day in due time, or the PageRank will it be divided by Dated Center in the next months"?
The last. I think that most Dated Center turn under the new infrastructure for things as info:, related:, link: and the PageRank, and I believe that all Dated Centers that have this new infrastructure received the snapshot of the most recent PageRank. I would not be surprised that it takes at least one to two months so that Dated them Centers on the other IPses receive the new infrastrucutre. (Yes, it is an infrastructure more light and different of the one that provided evaluations of more precise results on the order site: )
Are a lot of questions of the style "this the PageRank of such or such date? Would one say that these are the BackLinkses that date it.? "
Honestly, I would not worry for that - I am not even certain of it myself. To given one moment, we take the internal PageRankses, let's put them on a scale of 0 to 10, and export them to make they visible to the users of the rod of tools. If you split hair to the point to ask you what date precisely the backlinks have been posted, you certainly endure an OB (obession of the backlinks), and you should stop and should be going to make something else until the OB passes. I recommend briskly in this case the analysis of keywords, the reading of the logs to determine what content to add, to think about novelties so that your site attracts more visitors, to ask you how to improve the conversion of the visitors that arrives on your site, etc.
Supplemental Challenged: "The fact that Google cannot be one stake-to-daylight of the PageRank that quarterly is very disturbing! "
it seems me to have said previously that the PageRank is calculated permanently; him y'a of the machines that takes the information provided to the PageRank algorithm at Google, and calculate a resulting PageRank of it. Of this fact, at all times, an URL in the system of Google has a "up to date" PageRank, resulting of calculations made directly on the data provided to the algorithm. from time to time, this internal PageRank is exported toward what is visible to the users of the rod of tools (to see lower for more of details on timing).
Matt Crouch: "In fact, I am curious to know why you start speaking of a new update of PageRank. it is the first time". Good question, Matt Crouch,; I don't think to have communicated officially before about the export of PageRank. It is not a big event, here at Google. Honestly, I didn't even know that one made this kind of extraction quarterly now. When I have since people spoke of it on the Net, I verified if it was voluntary or no. These last months, one sometimes noticed some movements when an engineer "quibbled" on a Dated Center and played with things as the backlinks or the order info: (example: the "Pluto" update was damaged, it was not about in fact that of an engineer who worked on a Dated Center). I decided to make known therefore that this time, it was about a true export of PageRank, and not merely of the effects of a person's research.
New Jersey SEO: Is this stake-to-day of the PageRank going to affect the SERPs? Is one going to have the right to a cooling of the SERPs? (NDLR: Google Dance) "
Excellent question. When you see new PageRankses on the rod of tools, these #118alues have already been incorporated in the way of which we note and let's position our results of research. Therefore even though you can be happy to see a few more of PageRank on one page, it is not as if that was going to change something to its positioning in the results of research for as much. You won't see any page of research result (SERP) to change as a consequence of an export of PageRank - these evolutions are progressive since the previous export.
Here is.
That says all practically about the PageRank, of the stakes-to-day of the PageRank displayed in the toolbar, etc.
Is one going to be able to stop asking the questions maybe finally as I do be going to have more visitors maitenant than I have my PR 4"? (to read with an intonation of ingenuous)!
One goes maybe as finally to name this effect correctly: it is not a Google Dance, it is not one stake-to-day of the PageRank:it is an EXPORT!
More of info on the PageRank
Post By 328tianshi on 2008-9-11 20:50:14 [Reads:367]
More of info on the PageRank
Google Of from there one sees here, to panic the administrators of sites (webmasters, in current language) about one stake-to-day of PageRank.
I am alarmed to see to what point some (so-called) professional are dependent of this #118alue of PageRank displayed (in the rod of Google tools, or on the sites that exploit this information), when one knows to what point this information is completely petty.
Not only a too big number of people thinks that this displayed #118alue is living, to know that it influences on the positioning of their site, that it transmits more relevance to the other pages, etc. but in more, they see this #118alue like a real objective, whereas it is only an indicator.
What can be the interest of a question as "How to increase my PageRank to have more visitors"?
None, well evidently, since these two elements are not who are on no account bound.
They have common factors:a well positioned site has more visitors and a better PageRank.
The PageRank and the positioning have common, or parallel factors: a well referenced site is positioned potentially well, and has fact a big number of visitors potentially.
It is very likely that this same quality of referencement, associated to factors as the qualitative aspect of the content and an indication of confidence confer him a good enough PageRank also.
. but they are not bound!
Google has a service "Communication to the very original public", in the person of Matt Cutts, engineer-carry-speech at home. Even though this one sometimes comes us out of the tickets without interest on its culinary preferences in the canteen of the GooglePlex, or on what it read during his/its vacations. it also happens to him to reveal interesting information about the real working of Google - by opposition to the calculations of some webmasters-referenceurs of Sunday.
It was the case this last October 2. Is this anglophobia or the lack of interest that make that no one seems to be interested itself of it.? don't I know, but for landing to the first problem, me I am told that him was big time to translate this ticket of Matt Cutts, title "More info one PageRank."
It is about a literal translation, the most faithful possible to the original text, purified of some lines without report with the topic. It is a session of Q/R: the questions are in italic, the answers of Matt Cutts are in greasiness.
All few months, we put up to date the information that we display in the rod of tools, and all few months I see a set of questions repeating itself, let's take advantage then of the opportunity to answer some.
Philipp Lenssen: "Matt, I often wonder how the #118alue of the PageRank is stocked in intern. Is this a number to floating comma as suggested by some, or is this a real number"?
It is more discriminating to see it like a number to floating comma. It goes without saying that our internal calculation of PageRank is a lot more precise than a number between 0 and 10 as indicated by the rod of tools.
Viggen: Do I have need to know that? What brings me the fact to know this number? Why would worry me? Do I want to say, what is the interest of the PageRank for the small sites dad's"?
Viggen, I think that it is a very healthy attitude. If you are not interested in the PageRank and that your site carries itself well, me. that goes to me.
Andrew Hunter: Is it "that Dated them Centers that use a decidedly older infrastructure will be put to-day in due time, or the PageRank will it be divided by Dated Center in the next months"?
The last. I think that most Dated Center turn under the new infrastructure for things as info:, related:, link: and the PageRank, and I believe that all Dated Centers that have this new infrastructure received the snapshot of the most recent PageRank. I would not be surprised that it takes at least one to two months so that Dated them Centers on the other IPses receive the new infrastrucutre. (Yes, it is an infrastructure more light and different of the one that provided evaluations of more precise results on the order site: )
Are a lot of questions of the style "this the PageRank of such or such date? Would one say that these are the BackLinkses that date it.? "
Honestly, I would not worry for that - I am not even certain of it myself. To given one moment, we take the internal PageRankses, let's put them on a scale of 0 to 10, and export them to make they visible to the users of the rod of tools. If you split hair to the point to ask you what date precisely the backlinks have been posted, you certainly endure an OB (obession of the backlinks), and you should stop and should be going to make something else until the OB passes. I recommend briskly in this case the analysis of keywords, the reading of the logs to determine what content to add, to think about novelties so that your site attracts more visitors, to ask you how to improve the conversion of the visitors that arrives on your site, etc.
Supplemental Challenged: "The fact that Google cannot be one stake-to-daylight of the PageRank that quarterly is very disturbing! "
it seems me to have said previously that the PageRank is calculated permanently; him y'a of the machines that takes the information provided to the PageRank algorithm at Google, and calculate a resulting PageRank of it. Of this fact, at all times, an URL in the system of Google has a "up to date" PageRank, resulting of calculations made directly on the data provided to the algorithm. from time to time, this internal PageRank is exported toward what is visible to the users of the rod of tools (to see lower for more of details on timing).
Matt Crouch: "In fact, I am curious to know why you start speaking of a new update of PageRank. it is the first time". Good question, Matt Crouch,; I don't think to have communicated officially before about the export of PageRank. It is not a big event, here at Google. Honestly, I didn't even know that one made this kind of extraction quarterly now. When I have since people spoke of it on the Net, I verified if it was voluntary or no. These last months, one sometimes noticed some movements when an engineer "quibbled" on a Dated Center and played with things as the backlinks or the order info: (example: the "Pluto" update was damaged, it was not about in fact that of an engineer who worked on a Dated Center). I decided to make known therefore that this time, it was about a true export of PageRank, and not merely of the effects of a person's research.
New Jersey SEO: Is this stake-to-day of the PageRank going to affect the SERPs? Is one going to have the right to a cooling of the SERPs? (NDLR: Google Dance) "
Excellent question. When you see new PageRankses on the rod of tools, these #118alues have already been incorporated in the way of which we note and let's position our results of research. Therefore even though you can be happy to see a few more of PageRank on one page, it is not as if that was going to change something to its positioning in the results of research for as much. You won't see any page of research result (SERP) to change as a consequence of an export of PageRank - these evolutions are progressive since the previous export.
Here is.
That says all practically about the PageRank, of the stakes-to-day of the PageRank displayed in the toolbar, etc.
Is one going to be able to stop asking the questions maybe finally as I do be going to have more visitors maitenant than I have my PR 4"? (to read with an intonation of ingenuous)!
One goes maybe as finally to name this effect correctly: it is not a Google Dance, it is not one stake-to-day of the PageRank:it is an EXPORT!